As organisations face increasing scrutiny in today’s fast-paced digital environment, effective crisis communication has become a critical skill for every professional, according to Tochukwu Ogunaka, Head of Communications at the Young Advocates for a Sustainable and Inclusive Future (YASIF) Nigeria.
Ogunaka, a seasoned communication and media specialist, emphasised that crisis communication goes far beyond damage control when things go wrong. Instead, it involves the strategic management of information, perception, and trust during high-stakes moments when emotions run high and public attention intensifies.
“Handled well, it can preserve credibility. Handled poorly, it can damage years of trust in a matter of hours,” she stated.
In her insights shared recently, Ogunaka outlined essential principles that every communication professional should understand, dividing them into three critical phases: before, during, and after a crisis.
Preparation: The Foundation of Effective Response
Ogunaka stressed that the strongest organisations do not wait for a crisis to improvise. Preparation remains their greatest advantage.
“Prepare before the crisis, not during it,” she advised. This involves developing clear protocols, assigning roles, anticipating potential scenarios, and ensuring leadership alignment on how information will flow.
She warned that internal confusion inevitably spills into external messaging, underscoring the need for organisations — especially youth-led ones like YASIF working at the intersection of climate action, digital skills, and community empowerment — to know their risks and establish communication systems in advance.
During a Crisis: Where Trust is Tested
When a crisis strikes, Ogunaka highlighted five key elements that determine success:
Speed versus Accuracy: While silence allows speculation to fill the void, rushing out unverified information can cause greater harm. The ideal approach is to respond promptly with information that is grounded and reliable.
Acknowledge Before Explaining: Stakeholders seek reassurance first. Clearly recognising the issue demonstrates awareness and empathy before providing context. Skipping this step can appear as avoidance or insensitivity.
Control the Narrative Early: If an organisation fails to define the situation, others will do it for them. The initial communications often shape public perception long after the crisis ends.
Consistency Builds Trust: Mixed messages from different spokespersons erode credibility. Internal alignment must come before external communication — delivering one clear, unified message.
ALSO READ: MARKETINGWORLD’S AGENCY CEO OF THE WEEK: MUSA KALENGE OF NENDO, BRAVE GROUP, SOUTH-AFRICA.
Tone Matters as Much as Content: In high-pressure situations, a calm, direct, and human tone helps de-escalate tension. Defensive, dismissive, or overly technical language can worsen the situation.
After a Crisis: Rebuilding and Learning
Ogunaka noted that the work does not end once the immediate storm passes. Continued, transparent communication is essential to restore confidence.
Organisations must review what happened, identify gaps, strengthen systems, and actively reshape the narrative so the crisis does not define their entire story.
“A crisis is not the time to decide how your organisation communicates. It is the time your communication is tested,” she concluded. “When that moment comes, your response will do more than address the issue — it will reveal the true character and resilience of your organisation.”
As YASIF Nigeria continues its mission to equip young people and women with digital, green, and employability skills to tackle climate challenges, Ogunaka’s perspective underscores the importance of strategic communication in sustaining public trust and amplifying impact in the sustainability sector.
By
